I'm not really sure why WWE decided to unify their two titles last night. And the timing is very odd. I know we are near the end of the year, and I think they wanted to start off 2014 with 1 champion. But did it have to be on a PPV like TLC? Why not the Rumble? That's one of the big 4 PPV. TLC is just a gimmick PPV and one that is hit or miss. And you could have more time to build up tension and rivalry and tell a good story. It seemed like an on the spot decisions that didn't require a lot of thought or too much planning.
Think about this for a sec. WWE set up a match 1 year in advance at WM. The Cena vs. Rock match. And that wasn't for the title, well the first match wasn't. They will do that, but they won't dedicate more than 2 months to a unification match? Seems like poor execution to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment